The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that the number of people who have been infected with measles in the U.S. this year is at a record high, with over 600 cases reported as of April 12th. In addition to the increase in infections, there has also been an increase in deaths from the virus.
The what percent of new covid cases are unvaccinated cdc is a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It shows that the unvaccinated are 11 times more likely to die if infected.
Here’s what you should be aware of:
In July, a queue formed at a coronavirus vaccination location in Hawthorne, Calif. Credit… The New York Times’ Rozette Rago
Federal health officials released a handful of studies highlighting how effective the shots are at preventing infections, hospitalizations, and deaths — even when the highly contagious Delta variant has been dominant — a day after President Biden issued broad vaccine mandates aimed at propelling American workers to get vaccinated against the coronavirus.
The vaccinations’ protective power was assessed in three trials that used data from various parts of the United States. Between April and July, one study looked at almost 600,000 viral cases in 13 states, or about a fifth of the US population, and found that those who were not completely vaccinated were much more vulnerable to infection and death from the virus.
According to the research, they were 4.5 times more likely to get sick, 10 times more likely to be hospitalized, and 11 times more likely to die from the coronavirus than vaccinated people.
Even when the Delta variety was the predominant type of illness, vaccine protection against hospitalization and mortality remained high. The vaccinations’ efficacy in preventing infection, however, decreased from 91 percent to 78 percent, according to the research.
The research back up a slew of similar results over the last several weeks.
At a White House Covid briefing on Friday, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, stated, “As we have proven, study after study, immunization works.”
As more Americans become vaccinated, scientists have predicted that immunized individuals would make up a larger proportion of hospitalized patients. Dr. Walensky said, “What I want to emphasize here is that far over 90% of individuals who are in the hospital are still unvaccinated.”
“We still have more than ten times the amount of unvaccinated individuals in the hospital compared to vaccinated ones,” she said.
Two additional studies released on Friday found that older individuals’ vaccination protection was fading.
According to one research performed at five Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, protection against hospitalization decreased with age, falling to 80% for those aged 66 and older, down from 95% for those aged 18 to 64. A second research discovered that vaccination efficacy began to wane around the age of 75.
The results may aid in the identification of people who need extra dosages or booster injections. The Food and Drug Administration approved third doses of coronavirus vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna in August for certain individuals with compromised immune systems, including organ transplant patients.
Officials say there isn’t enough evidence on whether vaccinations’ efficacy deteriorates over time to suggest boosters for healthy people.
The research also indicates that, when compared to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the Moderna vaccine may be marginally more successful at avoiding infections and hospitalizations with the Delta version. Although both mRNA vaccines showed greater success rates than the Johnson & Johnson shot, the trials were not intended to compare the efficiency of various immunizations.
The Moderna vaccination had a 92 percent efficacy rate against infection in a survey of 33,000 medical contacts in nine states between June and August, compared to 77 percent for the Pfizer-BioNTech injection.
From Washington, Sharon LaFraniere provided reporting.
Last month, a queue formed for Covid vaccines in Corona, Queens, one of the New York communities that was struck first and worst by the epidemic. Credit… The New York Times’ Byron Smith
President Biden’s new coronavirus vaccination requirements will have far-reaching implications for American companies, schools, and political debate. For many scientists, though, the issue is simpler: Will these precautions be enough to stop a pandemic from spreading?
In the long run, the answer is yes.
According to many specialists interviewed, it has become apparent that the country cannot expect to stop the epidemic if 37% of Americans have not gotten a single dosage of Covid vaccination. As Americans go inside in their homes, schools, and workplaces as the weather cools, the number of cases and hospitalizations is anticipated to increase.
According to the experts, the administration’s new strategy should slow the spread of diseases and restore the nation to some sort of normality in the long run.
Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of Brown University School of Public Health, stated, “It’s going to profoundly alter the arc of the present surge.” “It’s precisely what we need right now.”
According to Natalie Dean, a biostatistician at Emory University, the vaccination requirements would protect millions more individuals, especially against serious illness, and alleviate strain on the health-care system. She said, “It also establishes a precedent for other organizations to make similar mandate choices.”
However, other experts warned that the effects of the ambitious strategy might take weeks to materialize. Immunization is not a quick procedure — a two-dose vaccine takes at least six weeks — and the administration did not prioritize techniques that work faster, such as masking and broad rapid testing.
The infectious Delta variety has swept over the country, proving to be a much more dangerous adversary than the original virus. Experts watched the variant’s march throughout Asia and Europe, sending rates rising even in the United Kingdom, which had successfully safeguarded most of its older people in the spring and early summer.
Only in mid-July did the variation become the dominant form of the virus in the United States, and the effects have gone much beyond what scientists had anticipated. In June, reassuringly low numbers of illnesses and hospitalizations climbed inexorably to almost 10-fold their previous levels. Every day, about 1,500 Americans, the great majority of whom are unvaccinated, die.
The requirements were issued on Thursday, after weeks of public health experts arguing that the federal government needed to do far more to increase immunization rates.
Nearly 100 million Americans will be affected by the administration’s requirements. Health-care professionals are among them. Any provider receiving Medicaid or Medicare funds will be required to demand staff vaccinations, according to the government.
Because health care institutions are high-risk sites for transmission, experts believe this is the approach most likely to have an immediate effect. And, according to Dr. Jha, there is sufficient historical precedence for holding hospitals to specific norms, such as the historical order to desegregate patients by race.
“We have a serious shortage of leadership from health-care institutions that have not mandated inside their own organizations, and the president must demand that patients be protected,” he said.
Some health-care and nursing-home employees, especially those nearing retirement age, may be compelled to quit their jobs as a result of the requirement. Even yet, according to Dr. Nahid Bhadelia, founding head of Boston University’s Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Policy and Research, the requirements have more benefits than drawbacks.
She said, “This is a critical step in getting us out of the epidemic.” “Those who are caring for the most vulnerable patients in the hospital should be our first line of defense.”
All private-sector companies with more than 100 workers will be required by the Labor Department to demand that their employees be completely immunized or tested at least once a week. Employers will be obliged to provide workers with paid time off to be vaccinated.
That decision alone will impact 80 million people in the United States; it’s unclear how many have already been vaccinated. In any case, the consequences will take time to manifest.
Given the period between the first two vaccination doses and the development of immunity, the impact of all of these requirements is unlikely to be seen for many weeks, according to Bill Hanage, an epidemiologist at Harvard University.
And Dr. Hanage doubted that the requirements would succeed in inoculating millions more individuals than those who had already chosen the vaccine. Older individuals, who will not be impacted by employment restrictions, are among those who need to be safeguarded the most urgently.
“I’m sure the anti-vaxxers are already gearing up to be outraged about this,” he said. (Several Republican governors have called the requirements illegal and have threatened to sue to halt them.)
Officials in both the Trump and Biden administrations have downplayed the significance of masks and testing in managing the epidemic by pushing on vaccination as the only way out, according to numerous experts.
“Putting on a mask is a lot faster than getting a group of people vaccinated,” Dr. Hanage added.
In May, a vaccination location in San Antonio. Governor Greg Abbott of Texas stated in a post on Twitter that he had signed an executive order “protecting Texans’ freedom to choose” whether or not to get vaccinated. Credit… The New York Times’ Tamir Kalifa
President Biden’s aggressive efforts to mandate vaccines were slammed by Republican governors throughout the country as an unlawful assault on personal liberties, and they threatened to sue the government to stop them.
Mr. Biden’s vaccine mandates, which will affect tens of millions of private-sector employees, health-care workers, federal contractors, and most federal workers, have quickly escalated a political battle between the administration and Republican governors, who have spent months fighting against mask rules and other pandemic restrictions even as infections and deaths in their states have risen.
They’re now claiming that Mr. Biden’s proposal is a big-government assault on states’ rights, private enterprise, and personal choice, and they’re threatening to sue to stop it, setting up a high-stakes constitutional battle over the president’s authority to combat the epidemic.
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem tweeted, “@JoeBiden, see you in court.” Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon stated the new regulation “has no place in America” and that he has instructed the state’s attorney general to prepare legal action.
South Dakota will take a stance for liberty. See you in court, @JoeBiden.
September 9, 2021 — Governor Kristi Noem (@govkristinoem)
Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas questioned President Biden’s power to mandate immunizations or weekly testing at private companies employing more than 100 people.
Mr. Paxton said on a radio show hosted by Steve Bannon, who served as a strategist for Donald J. Trump during part of his presidency, that “I don’t believe he has the authority to just dictate from the presidency that every worker in America, whether they work for a large company or a small company, has to get a vaccine.” “It is not in the president’s duty to dictate.”
Mr. Paxton, a staunch backer of Texas’ new anti-abortion legislation, vowed to “fight back” in a Twitter message: “Not on my watch in Texas.”
The federal government is attempting to impose its will on everyone. On every one of his unlawful demands, you have my promise that I will fight back. In Texas, not on my watch. https://t.co/TGAjXsbYba
— Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas (@KenPaxtonTX) on September 10, 2021
Mr. Biden had foreseen the terrorist strikes. He claimed he would do all he could to “require more Americans to get vaccinated to fight those obstructing public health,” and that if “those governors won’t help us defeat the epidemic, I will use my authority as president to remove them out of the way,” in unveiling his plan on Thursday.
Mr. Biden said on Friday that his requirements would survive Republican attacks.
Mr. Biden, who was speaking at a Washington middle school, replied, “Have at it.” “I’m very upset, especially since some of the Republican governors have been so casual about the health of these children and their communities.”
In a post on Twitter, Texas Governor Greg Abbott termed the measures a “attack on private companies.” He claimed to have signed an executive order safeguarding Texans’ freedom to choose whether or not to be immunize. He added, “Texas is already trying to put a stop to this power grab.”
“The Biden-Harris administration is pounding down on private companies and individual liberties in an unprecedented and dangerous way,” Arizona Governor Doug Ducey said on Twitter. He expressed concern about how many employees would be displaced, companies penalized, and children kept out of school as a result of the requirements, and promised to fight them.
According to the White House, Mr. Biden’s vaccine requirements will be enforced through the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which is now developing an emergency interim standard to carry out the mandate.
OSHA is in charge of workplace safety, which it is expected to argue includes vaccination requirements. Other recommendations for pandemic preparedness have been published by the FDA, including a regulation announced in June mandating health-care companies to provide protective equipment, sufficient ventilation, and social distance, among other things.
Doctors and scientists praised the vaccine requirements, which have been stressing for months the importance of increasing vaccination rates to stem the spread of the highly contagious Delta variant, which has pushed the national caseload to levels last seen in January, overwhelmed hospitals in hard-hit areas, and contributed to the deaths of more than 1,575 people per day on average.
However, the country is so fragmented ideologically that even experts are divided on whether Mr. Biden’s proposal would be successful.
The measures may be “too little, too late,” according to Dr. Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, who also cautioned that Americans opposed to vaccination may dig in and resist being told what to do. The American Hospital Association was wary, saying that it might “exacerbate the serious labor shortage issues that already exist.”
However, infectious disease specialist Dr. William Schaffner of Vanderbilt University compared the vaccine mandates to military duty during a time of war.
Dr. Schaffner said, “To date, we have depended on a voluntary army.” “However, the adversary has been strengthened, especially with the Delta version, and a volunteer army is no longer adequate. We need to put in place a draft.”
President Biden indicated the requirements would survive Republican attempts to overturn them a day after announcing a proposal to require two-thirds of American employees to be vaccinated against the coronavirus. CreditCredit… The New York Times’ Pete Marovich
In his first comments since announcing a comprehensive plan to vaccinate two-thirds of American employees against the coronavirus, President Biden indicated Friday that his broad requirements will survive objections from Republicans who have said that they intend to disobey them.
Mr. Biden, who was speaking at a middle school in Washington, D.C., replied, “Have at it.” “I’m very upset, especially since some of the Republican governors have been so casual about the health of these children and their communities.”
The president had announced a number of broad measures the day before, using a mix of executive orders and new federal regulations. His administration has taken steps to require vaccinations for health-care professionals, government contractors, and the overwhelming majority of federal employees, who may face disciplinary action if they decline.
“I don’t know of any scientist in this area who doesn’t believe doing the six things I’ve proposed makes a lot of sense,” Mr. Biden said.
Republicans slammed the Biden administration’s proposal as illegal, and a number of Republican governors, including Georgia’s Brian Kemp, have vowed to sue to block the requirements. The Republican National Committee chairwoman, Ronna McDaniel, announced on Twitter that her group will sue the Biden administration.
According to legal experts, the federal government’s wide powers and the public health emergency created by the coronavirus may eventually shield the government from legal challenges. In an interview, Jennifer Shinall, a law professor at Vanderbilt University, said that the requirement for federal employees would almost certainly result in litigation, but that they will most likely fail.
“I believe the legal arguments fail as long as there are arrangements for employees who are not healthy enough to receive the vaccination and possibly to some degree religious accommodations,” Ms. Shinall said.
Mr. Biden, who was first hesitant to impose requirements, is now pushing immunization more vigorously than any other president in modern history. There is a strong emphasis on reopening schools securely for in-person learning: the new standards would apply to individuals who teach in Head Start programs, Department of Defense schools, and Bureau of Indian Education schools. According to the proposal provided by government authorities, these institutions educate over 1 million students and employ almost 300,000 people.
On Friday, the president and first wife Jill Biden, a college professor who returned to teaching this week, visited Brookland Middle School. Her return to the school will allow one of the White House’s most powerful figures to talk directly about the difficulties that administrators, teachers, and students face.
On Friday, Dr. Biden stated, “We cannot always know what the future holds, but we do know what we owe our children.” “We owe them a guarantee that their schools will remain open as long as they are safe. We owe it to them to stick to the science.”
On Thursday, President Biden unveiled a broad new plan to combat the coronavirus at the White House. For The New York Times, Al Drago is to thank.
President Biden’s broad claim of his authority to mandate vaccinations for 80 million American workers is based on a first-of-its-kind interpretation of a 51-year-old statute that gives the federal government the right to protect employees from “grave risks” at work.
The emergency power granted by Congress under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, according to White House officials, is a valid and legal method to fight the coronavirus epidemic. They do admit, however, that the law’s emergency provisions, which were intended to safeguard employees from asbestos and other industrial hazards in past decades, have never been invoked to mandate a vaccination.
The effort’s uniqueness has prompted legal threats from Republican legislators, governors, commentators, and others, many of whom pledged on Thursday to fight the president’s use of the workplace regulations. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a Republican, described Mr. Biden’s conduct as “utterly illegal.” Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, a Republican, called the action “blatantly illegal,” adding that “Georgia will not stand for it.”
“Joe Biden has declared war on constitutional governance, the rule of law, and the employment and lives of millions of Americans,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican who has issued antimask measures, said in a fund-raising email sent on Friday.
Top presidential aides, on the other hand, do not seem rattled by what they describe as a predictable reaction from those quarters. Mr. Biden reacted to threats of litigation from his opponents on Friday morning.
He said, “Have at it.”
Experts said the government seemed to be on solid legal footing since it was relying on existing power given by the legislative branch to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which was backed up by decades of court decisions.
Many businesses had previously begun to implement vaccination requirements, although they were mostly targeting white-collar employees. Credit… Associated Press/Eli Hartman/Odessa American
President Biden unveiled a broad strategy to combat the pandemic on Thursday, including forcing businesses with more than 100 employees to require staff to be vaccinated or face weekly testing.
The decision comes as airlines, restaurants, and other companies are already suffering the effects of the Delta virus’s economic downturn. The new regulation, which Biden directed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to implement by creating an emergency interim standard, will have an impact on 80 million employees.
Many businesses were already preparing for requirements. In a recent poll conducted by Willis Towers Watson, 52 percent of respondents indicated they intended to implement vaccination mandates by the end of the year, and 21% claimed they already did.
However, many of these requirements, like those at Goldman Sachs and UPS, have targeted white-collar employees, who are more likely to get vaccinated. This presidential order will assist sectors with labor shortages, such as retail and hospitality, in implementing a requirement for their frontline employees.
Ian Schaefer, a partner at the legal firm Loeb & Loeb, stated, “It levels the playing field.”
Companies will now have to make additional choices, such as whether to pay for weekly testing and how to deal with religious exemptions – duties that many are already finding difficult.
According to a recent Aon survey of 583 worldwide businesses, 48 percent of employers with vaccination requirements indicated they accept religious exemptions, while just 7% said they would dismiss a worker who refused to be vaccinated.
Unanswered questions include:
How will the government collect, keep, and monitor employee immunization data?
What consequences will businesses face if they refuse to comply with the new rule?
Does it apply to all employees or just those who go to work in an office?
When will the new regulations go into effect?
Unsurprisingly, there was a mixed response. The Biden administration’s efforts were praised by the Business Roundtable and the US Chamber of Commerce. However, Montana Governor Greg Gianforte, a Republican, termed the new regulations “unlawful and un-American.” Montana is the only state that has banned vaccination requirements. The Republican National Committee announced its intention to file a lawsuit.
It’s uncertain if legal challenges will succeed. Except in jurisdictions with their own OSHA-approved workplace agency, OSHA’s emergency interim requirements preempt state governments’ existing laws. (About half of them do.) In jurisdictions where OSHA has direct authority, such as Montana, Texas, and Florida, the legal foundation for a challenge is likely to be weakest.
Are you the owner or employee of a company that will be impacted by the new vaccination mandate? If that’s the case, we’d want to hear from you. Please email Lauren.Hirsch@nytimes.com with your contact information in case we need to learn more.
Since a vaccination requirement for frontline health care employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs was announced approximately seven weeks ago, the immunization rate of frontline health care workers has risen. Credit… The New York Times/David Mills
President Biden’s new coronavirus vaccination mandates drew criticism on Thursday, but the two federal departments that already require vaccinations — as well as a number of states, cities, and private-sector companies — say their mandates are already achieving their goal of increasing vaccination rates.
According to Defense Department statistics, since the Pentagon announced last month that active-duty military personnel would be required to get vaccinated, the proportion of service members having at least one shot has increased from 76 percent to 83 percent.
According to Terrence Hayes, a spokesman for the Department of Veterans Affairs, which issued a vaccine mandate for its 115,000 frontline health care workers seven weeks ago, 82 percent of those employees are now fully vaccinated, up from 77 percent, and the number of shots given to all of them has more than doubled since early July.
The gains fall short of the aim of vaccinating nearly every employee, but the military, whose soldiers are used to following instructions and avoiding voluntary acts, is likely to see even greater numbers shortly. Each service branch is developing its own enforcement strategy; once the Army makes its formal statement, those figures are expected to rise, given that it is the military’s biggest branch.
Military commanders were fed up with vaccination rates that had remained unchanged for months. Commanders claimed the low vaccination rate was jeopardizing military preparedness, and there was worry at the Department of Veterans Affairs that employees might infect vulnerable veterans, a concern shared by nursing homes and private hospitals.
Pediatric clinical studies are still ongoing, according to the Food and Drug Administration, to assist identify the best vaccination dosage for children under the age of 12. Credit… The New York Times’ Christopher Capozziello
The US Food and Drug Administration said in a statement on Friday that it is “working around the clock” to make coronavirus vaccinations accessible to young children. In the interim, the CDC advised parents not to seek vaccinations for children under the age of 12, since they are not yet eligible for immunization.
The FDA said that vaccinations for young children will be available “in the coming months,” but that it could not provide a more precise timetable. However, once it receives applications from vaccine manufacturers, the FDA will “be prepared to complete its review as quickly as possible, likely in a matter of weeks rather than months,” according to Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting commissioner of the FDA, and Dr. Peter Marks, director of the agency’s Center for Biologics Research and Evaluation.
The existing vaccinations, none of which have been approved for children under the age of 12, may not be a safe or effective dosage for young children, according to the CDC. Pediatric clinical studies are still ongoing to help identify the best vaccination dosage for children under the age of 12.
“Children are not tiny adults,” Dr. Woodcock and Dr. Marks explain, “and problems that may be addressed in pediatric vaccination studies may include whether new dosages or different strength formulations of vaccines currently used for adults are needed.”
Officials from the Department of Health have previously voiced worry that complete clearance of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for individuals aged 16 and above may lead to parents seeking, or physicians giving, the injections to young children off-label, explicitly advising against the practice. Unvaccinated children under the age of 12 make up a significant portion of the unvaccinated population in the United States.
According to the FDA, some vaccine makers are still enrolling children in their studies, while others are still administering vaccines and monitoring children for possible adverse effects. The participants will be followed for at least two months in order for the researchers to identify any undesirable effects. Vaccine producers must then evaluate the data before officially applying to the FDA for permission or approval.
The FDA will next “examine the data carefully, completely, and independently to assess benefits and risks,” according to Dr. Woodcock and Dr. Marks.
“Our review of data on the use of Covid-19 vaccinations in children will not take any corners,” they said, “just like every vaccine choice we’ve made throughout this pandemic.”
“We will be submitting the findings from our research on five to 11-year-olds to authorities across the globe in the coming weeks,” Ozlem Tureci, BioNTech’s co-founder and chief medical officer, told Der Spiegel, a German news site, in an interview published on Friday.
Initially hesitant to impose mandates, Administration Biden is now pushing for vaccine requirements more vigorously than any other president in recent history, even in schools.
The president and Jill Biden, the first lady, visited Brookland Middle School on Friday. Jill Biden is a college professor who returned to the classroom this week. Mr. Biden encouraged parents to get their children immunized and promised a White House visit to the school after every kid had received a vaccination.
The president addressed the audience, “The safest thing you can do for your kid 12 and older is have them vaccinated.” “You’ve had them vaccinated for all sorts of things — measles, mumps, rubella — so kids can go to school and play sports, and they’ve had to have these vaccines. “It’s time to vaccinate them.”
Teachers in Head Start programs, Department of Defense schools, and Bureau of Indian Education schools will be subject to a slew of new regulations revealed this week. According to the proposal provided by government authorities, these institutions educate over 1 million students and employ almost 300,000 people.
On Friday, Dr. Biden stated, “We cannot always know what the future holds, but we do know what we owe our children.” “We owe them a guarantee that their schools will remain open as long as they are safe. We owe it to them to stick to the science.”
Children have been affected by the surge of new cases, driven by the more infectious Delta strain, tearing through unvaccinated communities, with over 30,000 children being admitted to hospitals in August, the largest number recorded to yet.
Children are still much less likely than adults, particularly older people, to be hospitalized or die as a result of Covid-19. However, experts believe that the rising number of children in hospitals, although modest in comparison to adults, should not be overlooked, and should instead motivate communities to do more to safeguard their youngest citizens.
Reporting was provided by Christopher F. Schuetze.
Last month, on the first day of school at iPrep Academy in Miami. Credit… Associated Press/Lynne Sladky
An appeals court in Florida decided on Friday that the state’s prohibition on school mask requirements may stay in place while a legal challenge proceeds through the courts. It overturns a lower court judge’s order to put the prohibition on hold, allowing the state’s biggest school districts to mandate facial coverings in the wake of a fatal coronavirus outbreak.
The Florida Department of Education may continue to penalize local school officials who enforce mask requirements without an opt-out option for parents, according to a decision in favor of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and other state authorities by the First District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee. Everyone in schools, regardless of vaccination status, should wear masks, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“We usually lose in the trial courts in Tallahassee, state and federal, if there is a political component to it, but we nearly always win in the appeals court,” Mr. DeSantis said on Wednesday.
The state has started withholding money equal to school board members’ monthly salaries from two districts — Alachua in Gainesville and Broward in Fort Lauderdale — that were among the first to impose stringent mask regulations. In all, 13 of Florida’s 67 districts have enacted such requirements, despite the state’s opposition.
The Biden administration has promised to re-fund any district that has been punished for following C.D.C. mitigation measures, such as universal masking. The federal Education Department has already notified districts that they may utilize federal relief monies to close gaps, and it unveiled a new grant program on Thursday that would offer an extra pool of money to make districts whole if they are financially punished.
Three conservative appellate judges wrote on Friday that they had “severe concerns” about fundamental issues in the case, including whether the parents who brought the original complaint had legal standing to do so.
They stated, “These uncertainties substantially militate against the appellees’ eventual success in this appeal.”
Judge John C. Cooper of the state’s Second Judicial Circuit ruled in favor of the parents late last month, saying that school districts’ mask mandates were narrow, reasonable, and necessary to protect a compelling state interest — namely, the safety of students and staff — following a four-day trial. The state promptly requested a stay of the decision, pending its appeal.
Judge Cooper denied the stay on Wednesday, leaving the mask requirements to remain in effect until an appeals court decision on Friday.
Erica L. Green contributed reporting to this article.
Prof. Sarah Gilbert in Oxford, England, last year. Mary Turner of The New York Times contributed to this article.
Prof. Sarah Gilbert of Oxford University, who led the development of the AstraZeneca vaccine, said on Thursday that a third dose was unnecessary for most healthy people vaccinated against the coronavirus, as Britain’s vaccine watchdog considers whether to introduce a booster program for healthy people vaccinated against the coronavirus.
In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Prof. Gilbert said that booster injections should be reserved for the sick and elderly, since most people’s protection from two doses is sufficient. “We need to deliver vaccinations to countries where just a small percentage of the population has been vaccinated,” she said. “We need to improve in this area. The first dosage has the greatest effect.”
Both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccinations may be used as “safe and effective” booster doses, according to Britain’s medical regulator on Wednesday.
Dr. June Raine, the regulator’s chief executive, said in a statement that it will now be up to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization in the United Kingdom to “advise on whether booster shots will be provided and, if so, which vaccinations should be used.”
Sajid Javid, Britain’s health minister, said last month that individuals with severely weakened immune systems, aged 12 and above, will get a third vaccination shot. The vaccine committee is debating whether to expand the distribution of boosters ahead of a winter season that may see an increase in coronavirus infections.
Several nations have already started or will begin providing booster injections to healthy individuals who have previously been vaccinated. However, since these initiatives are only available in wealthy countries, ethical concerns regarding vaccination inequities have been raised.
The World Health Organization has urged rich nations to postpone booster doses for healthy patients until at least the end of the year, in order for every country to vaccinate at least 40% of its people.
This month, New York City municipal employees are obliged to return to work. Credit… The New York Times’ Benjamin Norman
New York City’s entire municipal labor force, the nation’s biggest, will return to work on Monday when kids return to public schools in full force.
Mayor Bill de Blasio has ordered the city’s more than 300,000 workers to come to work five days a week, with no choice for a general hybrid or remote work schedule. As the mayor navigates a maze of safety regulations, the move will be keenly followed in towns throughout the country.
Most indoor social situations will need masks, and office employees will be forced to get vaccinated or subject to weekly testing. Except when employees interact with the public, social distance will not be needed.
Unionized employees have been outspoken in their opposition to the change. Mr. de Blasio, on the other hand, is dead set on restoring the city to anything like its pre-pandemic state, and he thinks that returning to work would significantly aid attempts to rebuild the city’s economy.
The mayor’s proposal was opposed by all but one of the city workers questioned by the New York Times. Many parents were concerned about working in crowded, open work environments with unvaccinated coworkers, while others questioned how they would balance their child-care duties if their children were required to quarantine after an in-school exposure. Several employees questioned, who requested anonymity because they were not allowed to talk publicly, said they or their coworkers would likely begin searching for employment with more flexible work-from-home rules.
In an interview, Henry Garrido, executive director of District Council 37, the city’s biggest public union, stated, “This seems insane to me.” “Because there is a new reality at this point.”
Mays, Jeffery C., contributed to this report.
Roundup of the World
“These frontline employees have served the nation,” said Marlène Schiappa, the French minister in charge of citizenship issues. It is only natural for the country to welcome them.” Credit… Getty Images/Thomas Samson/Agence France-Presse
To honor them for their devotion during the epidemic, the French government revealed on Thursday that it had given citizenship to nearly 12,000 international vital employees.
In a statement, Marlène Schiappa, the French minister in charge of citizenship issues, stated, “These frontline employees have served the country.” “It’s only natural for the country to welcome them.”
Immigrants accounted up a quarter of critical employees who stayed active during lockdowns, according to data from the Health Observatory of the Île-de-France region, which includes Paris. Immigrants make up 23% of people working in the region’s hospitals, but some may already be citizens.
The French interior ministry lowered the legal residence requirement for citizenship applications from five to two years in September 2020, and expedited the procedure for important employees such as health care experts, cashiers, child care providers, and trash collectors.
According to the interior ministry, more than 16,000 such employees have sought for citizenship, with more than 12,000 having already obtained it.
In other news, here’s what’s going on in the world:
While scientists warn of the danger of a third wave of illnesses, several Indian regions are gearing up for a fresh season of religious festivities. Last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration urged states to take “appropriate steps to prevent massive gatherings over the approaching holiday season” and, if necessary, impose local restrictions. In the days leading up to a holiday honoring Ganesh, the Hindu elephant deity, states have taken a variety of actions.
On Friday, Singapore opened its borders to additional nations and relaxed quarantine restrictions for certain incoming visitors, despite the fact that its daily case count surpassed 400 for the first time since August 2020 on Thursday. According to statistics provided by Singapore’s Ministry of Health, the number of serious cases has leveled down at an average of 23 per day this week.
Officials in Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh City, the heart of the country’s epidemic, said they intended to reopen the city’s economy next week. According to Reuters, Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh stated last week, “We cannot rely on quarantine and lockdown measures indefinitely.” “The Covid-19 epidemic is complex and unexpected, and it may continue for a long time.”
Last month, Alex Lee, a Cooper Square Committee activist, marched in New York with renters who are overdue on rent and faced eviction as pandemic-era safeguards expire. Credit… The New York Times’ Brittainy Newman
When the first wave of coronavirus hit the United States in the spring of 2020, it wreaked havoc on the economy, threatening the eviction of millions of low-income renters. Congress reacted the next year with a series of relief measures, including a $46.5 billion fund for emergency rental assistance.
However, when national eviction protections expire and the overwhelming majority of rental aid goes unused, the promise of that support has long ago given way to uncertainty and desperation, creating the very catastrophe Washington had wanted to prevent.
The House Financial Services Committee will conduct a hearing on Friday to look into the problems with the fund, known as the Emergency Rental Assistance Program, which, according to the Treasury Department, had only disbursed a quarter of its entire money by August 1.
According to one estimate, the Supreme Court’s decision last month to overturn the nationwide eviction moratorium has turned a tedious administrative issue into an urgent human catastrophe, putting at least 2 million tenants in imminent risk of eviction.
The flow of aid was slowed by a variety of issues, according to federal and local officials, housing experts, landlords, and tenants: bureaucratic missteps at all levels of government, onerous applications, landlord resistance, local officials’ reluctance to ease eligibility requirements for the poor, difficulty raising awareness that rental aid even existed, and a steep rise in rents that increased the cost of living.
The pandemic of the unvaccinated is a term that has been used to describe the increasing number of people who are not vaccinated. A new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that those who are not vaccinated are 11 times more likely to die if they get sick.
- cdc covid vaccine deaths chart
- what percentage of covid hospitalizations are unvaccinated
- what percentage of covid hospitalizations are vaccinated
- vaccine deaths by state
- cdc guidelines for unvaccinated